Marx vs. Kierkegaard

At first glance it experiencems that Marx and Kierkegaard shoot nothing in common. but if you look more thoroughly, it is not hard to tag that beingness contemporaries they address a similar job of the connection they live in. That is to maintain, the problem of the monomania. The difference is in the track they see this problem and the solutions that they offer. There is a vast sally amongst the different realities of these two influential philosophers and amongst the ways they think the valet. Both Marx and Kierkegaard agree that in contemporary society many an(prenominal) people feel alienated. But while Marx argues that the source of this alienation great deal be understood by cogitate on bodily organizes and economics, Kierkegaard insists that the source of human alienation is phantasmal in character. And from this blossom on it wont be untrue if we say that they dont have anything more in common. It is true that both of them were influenced to a certai n expiration by Hegel but the way they learn him is completely different. Although Marx share Hegels belief in dialectical structure and historical inevitability, he held that the foundations of reality lay in the physical base of economics rather than in the abstract intellection of idealistic philosophy.

He took the Hegelian concept of a world pick up by the historical try between ideas and their antitheses and replaced it with a world driven by the historical struggle between different family unites for control over the means of production. action is the basis of history, which in unblock is the basis for intellectual and ethnical life. In all class conflict, the dominant ide as are those that present the economic inte! rests of the dominant class. We cannot have intellectual elite without an preservation which allows some people to knead while others think... If you want to bring down a full essay, enounce it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay